Stewart Mader points us to Sarah Denman's look at the four groups most likely to be involved in a wiki or other enterprise 2.0 implementations. The list is:
- IT
- HR - and no it doesn't include learning or training - it's more the compliance side of HR.
- Business
- Executives
From Masie's recent social learning survey it appears that there is a lot of adoption by learning professionals.
Do you use any of the following technologies in your organization? Choose all that apply
| Technologies Used | Percent % |
| Corporate Collaboration Portal (eg. Sharepoint) | 57% |
| Peer Coaching/Teaching | 52% |
| Media sharing (images, videos) | 48% |
| Collaborative Spaces - Wikis | 47% |
| Blogs | 45% |
| Learning Systems for Social Learning (LMS/LCMS) | 42% |
| Social Networks | 41% |
| Employee Profiles | 33% |
| Content Ratings and Reviews | 13% |
| Twitter and Mobile Content | 12% |
So I'm not 100% sure I get the disconnect. Why are we not seen as a player when it comes to Wiki or Enterprise 2.0 ownership? How come Stewart and Sarah left us out?
